Find out how much GenerativeAgent can help you save
Calculate my ROI
ASAPP logo icon.
👋 Want to talk to our generative AI agent?
Click below to experience GenerativeAgent in action
Talk to GenerativeAgent: Try it now
Learn more about GenerativeAgent first
I’m interested in a demo

Stay up to date

Sign up for the latest news & content.

Published on
November 11, 2025

The new job description in CX: supporting AI to serve customers

Ayush Jain
Product Manager
7 minutes

From front line to control center

Customer service jobs are changing faster than ever. In the past, technology promised to replace repetitive tasks; today, it’s reshaping the very structure of the contact center workforce.

In traditional contact centers, the value chain ran linearly from customer → agent → supervisor. Within the future agentic enterprise, however, it will look more like a control center. Customer service AI agents will handle thousands of simultaneous interactions, while humans monitor, correct, and improve their performance.

From frontline execution to control orchestration—that’s the shift defining the new customer experience workforce.

Old CX Workforce New CX Workforce in Agentic Enterprise
Customer → Agent → Supervisor Customer ↔ AI Agents ↔ Human Oversight Layer
One-to-one interactions One human-to-many AI interactions
Manual monitoring Real-time supervision (when needed) and continuous optimization
Task execution System oversight and continuous learning

When customer service AI agents need a human hand

Even the most advanced AI agent still runs into boundaries: missing knowledge bases or APIs, limited authorization, system errors, or customers who simply want a person involved. In those moments, human oversight becomes the differentiator.

Organizations are beginning to formalize this oversight through new types of roles: people who sit between customer-facing AI and traditional support teams. Their job is to unblock the system so the AI agent in customer service can keep serving the customer without defaulting to full escalation.

The emerging AI-support workforce

Rather than competing with AI, these professionals support it—providing context, judgment, and oversight that ensure every AI-led customer interaction is accurate, compliant, and human-aligned.

Typical responsibilities include:

  • Approving or revising AI decisions that require judgment
  • Supplying information the system can’t yet access
  • Ensuring tone, empathy, and brand alignment
  • Auditing and improving the data or policies the AI relies on

Within ASAPP’s GenerativeAgent® environment, for example, the humans within the Human-in-the-Loop Agent (HILA) workflow hold the role to guide and supervise AI interactions in real time. They provide approvals, fill knowledge gaps, and ensure every automated action meets enterprise standards.

From customer service agent to advisor

The traditional contact-center agent spent their day resolving tickets, following scripts, and maintaining rapport with customers. In an agentic enterprise environment, that model changes entirely.

Customer service AI agents can now handle the first layer of engagement, understanding intent, retrieving information, and executing known workflows. When it encounters uncertainty, it turns to a human colleague for help.

In the HILA workflow, the human-in-the-loop agent isn’t on the phone or chat with the customer; they’re behind the scenes guiding the AI through decision points, approving exceptions, clarifying ambiguous data, or authorizing actions that require human judgment.

In practice, this means:

  • No more pleasantries: routine greetings and updates are automated.
  • No manual documentation: every AI interaction is automatically logged.
  • No full ownership of a case: humans intervene precisely where expertise or empathy is needed.

The result is a new kind of high-value knowledge work. It's less repetitive, more analytical, and essential to scaling customer experience responsibly.

Personas for a new era of agentic enterprise

It’s helpful to think of the human-in-the-loop agent as a new paradigm that depends on specific personas, depending on the type of issue the AI agent needs help to resolve. For example, resolving a technical error requires different skills than de-escalating an emotional customer.

The modern contact center increasingly employs a range of human-in-the-loop personas:

Persona Core Responsibility Skill Focus
Knowledge Base Advisor Maintain and enrich AI knowledge Research, problem-solving
Decision Authority Approve high-impact actions Policy judgment, risk evaluation
Customer Trust Advisor Guide AI through sensitive interactions Communication, empathy
Technical Support Advisor Resolve system or API issues Troubleshooting, analytics
Compliance & Risk Advisor Ensure legal and ethical alignment Regulatory expertise

Each persona plays a targeted part in keeping automated systems accurate, ethical, and trusted. Together, they form a cross-functional safety net for AI-enabled service.

The operational impact

Staffing for this model looks very different. Because each human-AI interaction is short, asynchronous, and consultative, productivity increases dramatically.

A single HILA can support several AI-driven customer conversations per minute, compared to the traditional one-to-one live interaction ratio. In one illustrative staffing scenario, human-in-the-loop agents handled nearly three times as many cases per hour as traditional agents—reducing the total workforce requirement by more than half while maintaining high-touch quality control.

This doesn’t eliminate jobs; it redefines them. The future workforce will consist of fewer live agents and more specialists who train, guide, and supervise AI systems.

In our experience deploying GenerativeAgent in large enterprises, including a major US airline and a global cybersecurity leader, we have seen a 60% reduction in Average Handle Time (AHT) in real-world deployment. Here is an example (assuming a simple linear model that doesn't take into account service levels and is not predictive):

throughput with human agent in HILA workflow vs Live agent

Rethinking training and recruitment for contact centers

Hiring for these roles requires a new mindset. Typing speed and customer empathy still matter, but analytical judgment, policy awareness, and digital dexterity now top the list. Training programs will shift from soft-skills coaching to data literacy, knowledge-base maintenance, and ethical decision-making.

Supervisors will track new metrics, such as average consult time, AI containment rate, and intervention effectiveness, instead of traditional average handle time.

This is the beginning of a broader reskilling effort across the service industry, one that rewards curiosity and adaptability over compliance.

Designing for the agentic enterprise

The agentic enterprise operates on a simple principle: machines act; humans ensure those actions are right. Getting there means re-engineering workflows, incentives, and culture so humans and AI collaborate by design, not exception.

It also means viewing every correction or approval as training data, a feedback loop that compounds intelligence over time. The organizations that succeed will also treat this as a workforce strategy, not just a technical integration.

GenerativeAgent optimization loop

The future of CX work

As automation takes the front line, humans move into the command center—interpreters of context, curators of knowledge, and custodians of trust. Their job is no longer to be the agent, but to make the AI a better one. The question for CX leaders isn’t “How many agents can we replace?” It’s “How will we staff the intelligence behind our intelligent systems?”

Because in the age of the agentic enterprise, supporting AI isn’t a side task. It’s the new job description.

Stay up to date

Sign up for the latest news & content.

Loved this blog post?