Table of Contents
AI safety cannot be a point-in-time exercise
As enterprises deploy agentic AI in high-stakes customer interactions, periodic security reviews are no longer enough. AI systems and the threats targeting them continuously evolve.
In this new report, 451 Research explores how ASAPP integrates adversarial testing directly into its model evaluation framework to continuously identify vulnerabilities, quantify risk, and strengthen every model iteration.
Trust must be earned through verifiable evidence, not vendor claims.
— Raul Castanon-Martinez, Sr. Analyst, 451 Research, part of S&P Global
Move from claims of AI safety to evidence
See why 451 Research identifies ASAPP’s security-first architecture, Continuous Red Teaming, and HILA™ human oversight model as meaningful differentiators for enterprises deploying customer-facing AI. Get the report.
*This report, licensed to ASAPP, developed and as provided by S&P Global (S&P), was published as part of S&P’s syndicated market insight subscription service. It shall be owned in its entirety by S&P. This report is solely intended for use by the recipient and may not be reproduced or re-posted, in whole or in part, by the recipient without express permission from S&P.
